December 7, 2007...8:09 pm
Proof Is In the Pictures
American Idol, Taylor Hicks has swept a lot of people into his lies, the public, the media, his fans, even friends and family. This whole cover was so intricate that people are stunned he could do such a thing. As reported, Caroline Lyders and Hicks even staged fake outings and tipped off paparazzi.
When the Sham Patrol staged the NYC photoshoot (pictures can be seen on PacificCoastNews.com) they made sure to cover all the tiny little details, such as putting Lyders in the same kind of shirt and flip flops as the Beach Woman, and also filling in some moles on Lyders which were apparent on the Beach Girl.
Do you think that’s nuts?
Well, given the extremes that they’ve gone, not really. They have been incredibly detailed and if you want to pass off two women as the same, you have to be.
The first thing someone is going to look for is: do they have the same moles and little details? The Beach Girl has a lot of moles, everywhere. Upper body, neck, interior legs, etc.
If these NYC photos were not staged, and instead were just candid shot of Lyders last year (before she took part in the sham), then markings would be very important. But since they knew these photos were being taken, focusing on those details is useless. Things like moles and markings are easily to duplicate, what is impossible to duplicate is body height and facial structure.
The idea is to fool people into thinking it’s the same person. We already know she is not, we know it for a fact (now confirmed by forensic expert Lois Gibson) — so obviously what we’re looking for is things that they MISSED-not things that they covered.
That is where the birthmark is important. They missed it.
The Beach Woman has an unusually large birthmark on her inner left ankle. It shows up darker in some photos depending on the lighting and shade, and it seems have blond hair on it as well.
In this photo above you can see the pigment pretty easily.
Due to the shade here, it’s really obvious.
Here you can only see the hair on the marking, it’s difficult to see the actual mark, which means the birthmark is obviously more noticeable from the front side, of her leg, not the back. This is useful information because now we know that any photo of Lyders front inner angle leg should show a birthmark (if she was the same person).
Again very obvious. You can also see she’s got a lot of little moles on her legs.
Here the pigment is less obvious, but the hair on the mark is very noticeable. The birthmark is rightabove the ankle bone.
This photo is grainy due to the light, but you can see it’s missing on Lyders ankle. How could this be?
Maybe Caroline got it removed? Oh wait, you can’t remove birthmarks. They’re with you for life… and they’re what PROVES two different people. Also notice how small Lyders’ ankles are in comparison. The women have entirely different body types. The Mystery Blond is tall and muscular and worked out. Lyders’ is short, petite and very, very small boned.
Click here to check out the massive height difference.
Also, when trying to get to the bottom of a switching women fake girlfriend scam (since that happens all the time!) the placement of features is a no-brainer.
During an email conversation with one of Caroline Lyders’ friends, they said she is known for wearing turtlenecks because she’s extremely self-conscious of her unusually long neck.
If Lyders keeps wanting to assume the identity of the Beach Girl, she should consider collagen and braces.
The following photos have straight lines to clearly show the difference in placement.
Here they are compared nose to nose, mouth to mouth.
Conclusion: The top of Lyders’ ear hits the corner of her eyes and the bottom hits the middle of her mouth. The top of Beachie’s ears meets the TOP of her eyebrows and the bottom of her ears meets the tip of her nose. That is a huge difference in ear placement. Almost 2cm apart.
Lyders also has a very strong jawline, while Beachie has soft features and a rounded or square jaw.
When viewed in direct profile with no tilt - the same person does not have these “inconsistencies.” If you really want to have fun, go find some profile pictures of the same person and do this little trick.
The woman on the beach is also around 5′9. Caroline Lyder is 5′3-5′4
Beach girl is almost as tall as Taylor. Her thigh is almost as long as Taylor’s, which only confirms her tall height. She’s stepping forward which means she’s even slightly taller than what she appears.
Now look at this photo and laugh:
The difference in height is drastic.
Again you can see the Beach Girl is almost as tall as Hicks.
Radar has recently reported that the woman on the beach was actually a high-class escort, which would explain this insane charade.
24 Comments
December 7, 2007 at 10:13 pm
My God, you can even see how much their legs differ in size…..and the birthmark….brilliant MFOYA. I’ve been waiting to see the close-ups.
Who in their right mind can dispute these?
December 7, 2007 at 10:32 pm
Yup. Plain as day. In addition to the birth mark, Beach woman has thicker ankles than CL. Oops again!
December 7, 2007 at 10:46 pm
“it must be my eyes,”
Well, the majority of SP’ers are middle-aged and starting to lose their sight. But even with that much detail and you are still going to believe otherwise, you have more than a sight problem. You have a mental problem.
December 8, 2007 at 12:34 am
The birthmark is not even refutable. What is especially interesting is that these two women have a completely different build as many people have been saying from day one. CL is slight and little and small boned. She is very petite. The marines build is entirely different. She has thicker ankles, thicker calves. Those are just two different sets of legs. It seems like they are facially similar but in the body they are ENTIRELY different.
December 8, 2007 at 12:54 pm
I’m not a person that wants to believe all this but you have made your case. Those are 100% two different women. I have a birthmark that is shaped very similar to that underneath my right arm. No they are not removable (unfortunately). Also the thickness of their legs is drastically different. Small boned vs bigger boned. Also Caroline Lyders ears do sit very low on her head, unusually low and the woman on the beach has ears that sit unusually high which gives her a more “royal” look. It’s uncanny how similar they look however! it might be the hair and the nose that are the most similar. When I firsy saw these photos and they said its caroline lyders i was a little surprised..but let it go. Because who on earth would switch women out? That’s just strange. But it doesn’t surprise me that Taylor could pull it off. There was a lot of strange things in this whole thing now that i think about it. It didn’t feel real, but again who would ever think it was fake? What a disaster. Thanks for letting me post…
December 8, 2007 at 8:04 pm
That is one ugly birthmark. That’s one thing CL can be happy about… You can even see the birthmark in one of the beach pictures from far away in one of the earlier blog posts. Very interesting….. A lot of people are going to freak out over this post MFOYA and go into denial. It might be a little too much truth. As for Caroline, sorry but what a joke. Pretending to be a woman you’re not. Geez, she should never leave her house again because that is embarrassing stuff.
December 8, 2007 at 9:29 pm
I see it’s another group therapy session for Haterz Anonymous.
Y’all are just going stir crazy waiting on Aaron’s cd to be released, so your idle hands pick away at the object of Tay’s desire. Le Muse Extraordinaire. The cream in his coffee. The twinkle in his eye. The hand in his wallet.
But I had an epiphany. Carolyn Lyder (tm Taylor) doesn’t need me to fight her battles. Someone like her is probably familiar with the desperate cattiness and jealous machinations of every female in spitting distance. Every woman wants what Carolyn has. Who wouldn’t want to leave their job under murky circumstances and have that discussed on the internet? Who wouldn’t want closeup photos of one’s squinting face and dowdy figure scrutinized on a daily basis by hundreds of people? Who wouldn’t want to be able to claim Aaron as a dependent on their tax returns, year after year?
There is especially no substance to the attacks on her accomplishments. While it’s true that even after 10 years in the business, her career can best be described as, uh, “nascent”, there are other areas where she has soared. Like that high school piano playing thing. She’s gotten more mileage outta that than a Prius on a full tank of gas.
If busting up the formerly cohesive fanbase of a performer whose music she probably doesn’t even listen to isn’t an achievement, I don’t know what is. And at the rate things are going, she’ll totally sidetrack him until the dying embers of his career cannot be revived. Gotta admire a woman with the commitment required to get a job done!
December 8, 2007 at 10:25 pm
Welcome back Bhammer!! Your satirical posts are just classic! I will add this one to my collection.
December 9, 2007 at 8:30 am
Votem, I’m just trying to drive the devil from this site. It’s arduous work, requiring many Kool-Aid breaks, but it’s worth it!
December 10, 2007 at 9:41 am
It’s not a birthmark, it’s sand. Sorry, but birthmarks aren’t three dimensional. Look at your third to last photo with her leg laying over, it shows the sand very clearly. Even your photo with the red circle confirms that it is sand. Blonde hair doesn’t reflect the light like that. And, how many women do you know shave their legs but not their birthmark? I don’t see any other “hair” on her leg. It’s sand!
December 10, 2007 at 10:57 am
And the denial continues. I’ve been wondering how long it would take before someone would blame it on the sand. The sand makes people taller and shorter and adds birthmarks to legs. WOW! It boggles my mind how much in denial and how many excuses people come up with, rather than admitting the truth. Taylor Hicks and company lied their asses off all summer long and made fools of his fans.
December 10, 2007 at 12:07 pm
lmao! Apparently, sand is refuge of last resort among the deluded fangirls. Get a clue: It’s still a birthmark. It doesn’t matter if that’s sand or hair on it.
December 10, 2007 at 12:52 pm
Funny how it has to be sand in all photos taken from different angles at different times. That darn sand keeps sticking in that one place, even when beach girl is about to leave the beach!! I guess ‘Tired’ is like those posters who still insist that’s Caroline on the beach looking taller because of the perspective. How could this be in several photos from different angles where the beach girl keeps looking TALL, and how is it Taylor doesn’t look taller as well? How does perspective work for her and not for him? And how does beach girl keep looking TALL in different beach locations and angles. What kind of moving (and hidden) sand bar is she supposed to be standing on anyway??
The thing about these closeups (and this can be verified by looking at the original photos on Splash) is that Caroline and the beach girl have different leg structures. The beach girl has long legs, thicker legs & ankles and big feet. Her legs are toned and muscular. She has great legs. Caroline’s are not. Just comparing the legs, ankles and feet, you have to know they are two different women. Other than the birthmark that just HAS to really be incredibly magical adhesive sand. LOL
December 10, 2007 at 2:13 pm
What kind of moving (and hidden) sand bar is she supposed to be standing on anyway??
A traveling sand bar? One that manages to elude Taylor’s big ass feet? Cause its got a thing for blondes? Cheeky sand bar! ROFLMAO!
December 10, 2007 at 2:21 pm
You’re logic about Taylor’s height just doesn’t make sense. It’s not the sandbars or his feet that cause him to stay the same height. It’s because he’s kneeling!!!
December 10, 2007 at 3:27 pm
A moving sandbar that’s got a thing for blondes? LOL. Magically makes very short blondes look very tall. Only to be found on a certain Maui beach, and on one day of the year. A new Wonder of the World!
And if Taylor is kneeling in those photos, then he’s got to be taller than Andre The Giant in real life! ROTFLMAO.
Whatever will they think of next?
December 10, 2007 at 4:59 pm
LOL. There’s another site now stealing mfoya’s pictures and making comparisons to show that they are the same woman because of markings on the face. So they have the faces circles showing the same marks… meanwhile the dumbasses didn’t realize MFOYA has flipped the photo so they’re comparing CL’s left to the marines right showing how the marks are the same. LOL!!!! meanwhile it’s the wrong side of the face! I was LMAO. funny how these people see what they want to see. creating shit that’s not even there and ignoring the obvious. its unreal. they can’t handle that Taylor as played them like this.
December 10, 2007 at 6:20 pm
I think we should give the sand bar a name. He seems to have taken on a life of his own.
By the way, the thing to remember about all these sites that copy MFOYA is that imitation is the best form of flattery. Or as Taylor famously said “Flattery is the best form of humor.” And the MFOYA copycats sure do bring the funny. So I guess he was right.
December 10, 2007 at 6:43 pm
I think the excuses are becoming ridiculous. I didn’t really believe it either but all the differences are adding up and there’s too many of them.Similiarities make people look alike but differences make them DIFFERENT PEOPLE. The first thing that caught my attention was the enormous height difference. Now when you see their legs next to each other, their heads next to each other, birthmarks and so on, that is a little too many differences to deny and keep saying its the same woman over and over again. The same people really don’t look all that different in photos. Angles or not. The height is a big one. They look a lot alike these ladies but I would bet a lot of money that that is not Caroline Lyders in those beach photos. Unless she changed a lot of things and then went back to her same oldself after Maui it would be kinda impossible. And sorry but the neck thing is true. her neck is very long in all the photos of her. There isn’t one where she looks like she has a normal length neck but in all the maui photos the womans neck looks normal.
December 11, 2007 at 9:05 am
I was one of the skeptics but comtinued to read and question. The most obvious difference to me is in the profile pictures. The length of the two women’s jaws are completely different and if you look where the line of the eyes line up with the ears it is obvious they are not the same individual. CL eyes line up with the top of her ear, where the other woman’s eyes hit almost mid ear. I am convinced. There is still the looming question, though. Where is the beach woman! Someone, somewhere must know her and who she is. How can that have been revealed yet. They must’ve paid her off in a big way.
December 11, 2007 at 11:06 am
Krauss - you said: There isn’t one where she looks like she has a normal length neck but in all the maui photos the womans neck looks normal.
the ones where CL looks like she has a normal length neck ARE the Maui photos.
December 11, 2007 at 12:33 pm
hicksfan, seriously. Wake up.Your denial is seriously weird. CL doesn’t have a normal length neck honey….ever.
December 11, 2007 at 3:13 pm
hicksfan,
“the ones where CL looks like she has a normal length neck ARE the Maui photos”
Since CL isn’t in any of the Maui photos, this would be very difficult.
It’s known that CL finds her own neck abnormally long and tries to hide that fact by wearing scarves. You can see that in many older photos of her and in that Favorite Shape Triangle music video that Aaron put together in 2001.
You say CL has a normal neck? CL believes she has an abnormal neck. Like those who believe CL is tall when she says on a GMA appearance that she is short and jumps up to try and equal the height of Robin Roberts (who is about beach girl’s height). You don’t even believe the person who knows herself best of all!
June 4, 2008 at 8:39 am
[...] on the Beach” … The woman on the beach is also around 5???9. caroline lyder is 5???3-5???4 …http://makingfunofyourass.com/2007/12/07/proof-is-in-the-pictures-part-ii/OnMilwaukee.com Milwaukee Buzz: Milwaukee Talks: WISNs Caroline …Many TV news teams boast of their [...]